So the Encyclopedia is 'handy'. On a scale of 1-5 (1 being 'order it for the school library and consult on rare occasions' and 5 being 'order it immediately!') where would you put it?
I don't know whether the comment that there was "no record" of Salman al-Farsi (May Allaah be pleased with him) after the Prophet's (Peace be upon Him) death was from the article or your own comment.
In any event, it isn't true as Islamic history sources record Salman as having died in the year 35 after the hijrah during the khilafah of 'Umar (May Allaah be pleased with him) at Ctesiphon.
Salman's life is full of many beautiful lessons for seekers of truth. Ridiculous statments by fringe sects should not distract us from the reality of his life.
It is handy -- but I'm not sure yet if I'd recommend it. It seems to be written more with an eye to providing reference material to current polemics rather than historical ones. There's a lengthy entry, for example, on the Gospel of Barnabus -- the Renaissance era forgery that tracks fairly closely the Islamic view of Jesus, but no entry at all on Isra'iliyyat, the writings of Jewish converts to Islam interpreting passages in the Qur'an.
Abu Noor --
Thanks for pointing that out. For my part, I'd prefer to believe that Salman was a historical figure.
Salman was the advisor of Prophet Mohammed and he is one of the most important figures who spread the divine message of the religion of Tawhid -Islam-